You remember that documentary called “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed“? That was the one that came out a year or two ago, hosted/narrated by Ben Stein, that looked at incidents where educators and scientists were ridiculed, denied tenure, and sometimes fired simply for believing that there might be evidence of design in nature. Well, here’s another one for Stein to investigate….

David Coppedge of JPL

David Coppedge at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory

David Coppedge is a high-level IT specialist working at the esteemed Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), a NASA lab overseen by the California Institute of Technology (Caltech). Until recently, Coppedge was a “Team Lead” Systems Administrator on the ambitious & high-profile Cassini-Huygens mission to Saturn. Then, Coppedge was demoted for religious proselytizing on the job. But, is that really what he did? Not quite.

It seems that Coppedge is guilty of talking about Intelligent Design and loaning/giving pro-ID DVDs to some of his co-workers. He did not force anyone to talk about ID or to take the DVDs. These co-workers had expressed interest or at least willingly accepted the DVDs. None of these people complained to the higher-ups. While Coppedge is a Christian (who edits a private, pro-ID blog), no proselytizing was actually involved. But, one of the supervisors who was aware of the discussions allegedly confronted Coppedge, angrily asserting that “Intelligent Design is religion”, accused Coppedge of “pushing religion”, and ordered him to stop talking about ID, religion, or politics, (why not sports, too?) or he would be fired. That was back in March of 2009, at which point Coppedge says he complied with the demand. He then got a written warning and was demoted the following month.

Coppedge’s attorney, William Becker, Jr., has now filed a lawsuit on behalf of his client in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles. Caltech, JPL, and three of Coppedge’s superiors (i.e., his direct supervisor, group supervisor, and the Manager of IT Resources for the CIO) are all named in the suit. The allegations include: religious discrimination, harassment and retaliation; violation of free speech rights; and wrongful demotion.

Hold up! “Religious discrimination…”? Didn’t I just say there was no proselytizing going on?

Yes. But, the anti-ID crowd usually conflate or connect modern ID Theory with creationism (e.g., “intelligent design creationism”). Of course, anyone who knows much about Intelligent Design and is intellectually honest knows the difference. While compatible with creationism (which begins with a religious text), ID actually begins with observations about the physical world and what we know about the effects/products of intelligent agents versus those of mere chance & necessity. It is the philosophical (and perhaps theological) implications of recognizing design in nature that upsets certain people, especially committed materialists. So, they rhetorically refer to ID Theory as “creationism in a cheap tuxedo” and then dismiss it as religious nonsense.

Although ID is not religion, and the DVDs in question “make no reference to any religion, scriptural text or religious belief”, what matters is that JPL’s management decided the problem was that Coppedge was “pushing [his] religion”. The problem for them is that it is illegal for an employer to “discriminate against an employee based on what they deem is religion,” as per California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). (Go here for counterpoint arguments to what ScienceBlogger Ed Brayton and ACLU lawyer and Loyola law professor Gary Williams have to say on this.)

According to Casey Luskin, an attorney who works at the Discovery Institute and is a consultant on the suit,

For the offense of offering videos to colleagues, Coppedge faced harassment, an investigation cloaked in secrecy, and a virtual gag order on his discussion of intelligent design. Coppedge was punished even though supervisors admitted never receiving a single complaint regarding his conversations about intelligent design prior to their investigation, and even though other employees were allowed to express diverse ideological opinions, including attacking intelligent design.”

Incidentally, according to the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, “Earlier this month Coppedge claims he met with his supervisors, who told him that the written warning was inappropriate and it would be removed from his file. The suit calls this is [sic] ‘an admission of liability.'” JPL maintains their position that Coppedge’s conduct was inappropriate, that his demotion was justified, and the “gag order” on his speech in the workplace remains in effect.

JPL logo

JPL logo

The other important issue, here, is that of free-speech and First Amendment rights. To some degree, employers have a right to monitor and restrict what their employees talk about while on the job. Issues of profanity, racism, and sexism come to mind. But, did JPL act appropriately in this case? Keep in mind that the lab is federally funded and is the primary planetary spacecraft center for NASA, an agency of the U.S. government’s Executive Branch.

This is just the latest of several such cases where public and private institutions are alleged to have unfairly discriminated against scientists and others for holding and/or promoting views contrary to the Darwinist establishment. In fact, Becker is also representing the American Freedom Alliance in their First Amendment suit against the California Science Center in Los Angeles, which I blogged about at “Shenanigans at the California Science Center“.

You can read the formal complaint in its entirety here. I found the details of the confrontation, secret investigation, and subsequent disciplinary action (Section E, pp. 8-14) particularly interesting and disturbing. I can only imagine the kind of stress, anxiety, humiliation, and fear for his continued employment that Coppedge has been under the past year.

Anyone who thinks that today’s culture of science allows an open discussion of evolution is sorely mistaken,” said Dr. John G. West, associate director of the Center for Science and Culture. “When it comes to intelligent design, private and government-run agencies are suppressing free speech.”

What say you?

Oh, in case you were wondering what the offensive DVDs were, check out “Unlocking The Mystery Of Life” and “The Privileged Planet“.

Advertisements
Comments
  1. pastorjeffcma says:

    I heard about this the other day on IDTF podcast. But don’t let anybody tell you this kind of stuff goes on. In fact, if you mention it somebody will tell you are becoming a conspiracy theorist (as I have been told). We all know that Academic Freedom is alive and well.

  2. Duder says:

    We all know that ID proponents are completely honest about there religious views and their reasons for putting forward ID in contrast to Evolution are purely scientific; we should be confident that Mr. Coppedge is telling the full story.

    • sirrahc says:

      Thanks for stopping by, Duder. Do I detect a note or two of sarcasm? Perhaps cynicism? ;->

      I don’t think Coppedge’s religious views were ever in question, and whether he had a religious motive for advocating ID doesn’t matter. The question is whether his bosses handled the matter (i.e., gag order, demotion, etc.) legally, given that they believe ID to be “religion”. Whether or not ID really is or not is actually irrelevant.

      I also disagree with the more general implications of your comment, but I think we all hope the facts come out, with everything understood in context, and that justice is done.

  3. Hobbes says:

    I suspect there is more to the story than is presented here. In any case, JPL is an establishment dedicated to science, not myth. If ID can stand the rigors of the scientific method, then it would be accepted as a valid scientific theory. It cannot, thus, it is not science.

    @ Duder: “We all know that ID proponents are completely honest ”

    Not so. ID IS a religious belief, and when its advocates say it is not, they are simply being deceitful–something at which the “family-values” leaders are so adept irrespective of it’s sinful nature (according to their Bible). That they really believe the myth I have no doubt, but to present it as science, where there is no evidence, is to present a lie.

    Having said that, if discussing the myth with others in a causal setting is what was going on, then the management overreacted. But, again, I don’t think we have the whole story.

    • sirrahc says:

      Hi, Hobbes. Thanks for visiting and commenting.

      I, of course, agree that management overreacted. And, I’m sure you’re right about there being more to the story. The question is whether we have sufficient details to make reasonably-informed comments.

      I read Duder’s comments as being rather sarcastic, so I’m pretty sure he would agree with you.

      “ID IS a religious belief”

      Can you clarify why you believe this to be the case?

  4. pastorjeffcma says:

    “Can you clarify why you believe this to be the case?” Good luck on getting an answer to that question that is anything more than an articulately worded variant of “because it is.” At least I have been astoundingly unsuccessful at getting past that level of conversation. Who knows–you may be better at bringing about proper conclusions than I am.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s